Isn't there a huge disconnect being sold to the community in this election? Can someone explain to me how candidates can be in favor of bringing more jobs to the community, and at the same time, actively opposed to the Chamber of Commerce? Isn't the Chamber of Commerce made up of the communities' current employers? What message do we send to potential employers, when we disrespect our current employers? How many employers will we run out of town, lulled by the campaign rhetoric demanding more, better paying jobs?
Please correct me if I am wrong. I'm not sure where some here are getting their facts, but several statements are so incorrect, they should not be allowed to stand unchallenged.
I watched the Council meeting. My recollection is that Garman signed an exclusivity agreement with ICMA - not the Fire Union, long before the negotiations for a separate 457 plan for firefighters. When Garman signed the exclusivity agreement, there was only one 457 plan, and it was available to all employees, including firefighters. The exclusivity agreement benefitted all employees, because as a result of it, no employee would be required to pay a "load" on their 457 plan investment.
Gilda is correct. The firefighters will continue to have the option of investing in a 457 plan available only to their union, with no "load", but it looks like it will come at the expense of the rest of the City employees, who may end up paying a "load" to invest in their 457 plan.
And as for Garman: I recall Garman securing a new contract, by a 4 - 3 vote of the council. Thereafter, he resigned, stating essentially that he was rejecting the council's offer of a new contract. After Councilman continued to campaign against Garman instead of on the issues, an exasperated Garman resigned before the end of his contract. This is a good example of what has been going on with this City Council for the past four years. Dissatisfied that they are defeated, the minority refuse to accept the will of the body, as reflected in the votes, and continue to pull in an opposite direction. This is the change I see the Change Group advocating. It is contrary to the democratic republic values upon which our Country was founded, and it is harming our community.
Don't get me wrong - I'm not letting either side off the hook. The city's bargaining team should have been aware of the effect changing the plan would have for employees (they say they weren't). Likewise, the firefighters bargaining team should have known what they were bargaining for. It seems they knew the “ends” they wanted but they didn't understand the hardship the “means” would put on their fellow employees/unions. Now you want to make Steve Garman the big bad meanie in all this, but the story I'm hearing is that the “non-exclusive 527” point was not even under consideration when he signed the exclusivity agreement with ICMA.
You can spin it either direction.
Let's clear a few things up. Garman was NEVER present in any negotiation/arbitration sessions with Local 505. I'm sure he gave the marching orders, but one of his asst. 's and two members of city legal were there, along with the high dollar attorney from Springfield who cost the tax paying citizens of Decatur thousands, and lost her case terribly! This latest insurance report shows how much money the city has saved on premiums by going to Blue Cross/Blue Shield. Garman, along with a couple of other former city officials, defended the previous insurance carrier to the very end, regardless of how much more it was costing the tax payers. Was it because they were building a new complex in the infamous "hole" downtown? I guess we'll never know. Had it not been for Ruderman sniffing out these improprioties, we'd still be paying dearly for the other insurance carrier.
As far as the 457 plan goes, this was agreed to early on. There was no information brought forward by the city that Garman had signed this exclusive agreement, so there wasn't a "cog" thrown into the negotiations by the union. For crying out loud, the city wouldn't even meet with Local 505 until AFTER the previous contract had already expired!
The biggest problem with Garman was that he was here about 7 years too long, and many (not all) on the council during his tenure drank the kool aid and bought into anything he was selling. Wabash Crossing is a joke! How many people OWN property there? Last I checked it was ZERO! Go ask the owner of Buffalo Wild Wings in Forsyth where he wanted to build his new store (which is packed everytime I go by). He wanted to go into the Target area. Garman said no because he wanted a high end restaurant like a J. Buck's to go in there. What a joke. I could go on and on! I realize he's gone, but we'll suffer from the mismanagement of this "financial genious" for years to come! Let me close by saying that Ryan McCrady is a great guy, and I'm sure he'll lead us down the right road. I just hope he's here long enough to get us there!
CLARIFICATION
Three people currently serving on council, were on council when the leaf burning ban was approved. Foster and Stockard voted for the ban and, now Mayor Mike Carrigan, was the lone vote against the ban.
This is what I read on the Tribune site.
Doug: Onthe first night Foster was on the council-this time- he said he was NOT on the council when the leaf burning issue came up. I think he would tell the truth about that because it would come back to haunt him as dishonest if he did not tell the truth.
Gilda
I thought I had the correct info. so my assumption is he lied if he told everyone he was not involved.
I am considering Pat McDaniel. The only thing holding me back is he is against the Responsible Bidders Act...as it is written. I will get clarification from him on this issue. Mrs. Stockard is not even in my top 5 for the 4 year race.
Orv....I think your team missed the boat by not attending the debate at the Civic Center. Mrs. Phillips had strong words for Mr. Foster and Foster was not there for rebuttal. Unless it violated the rules I think you should of been on the stage speaking on behalf of Mr. Foster.
Would you please fill me in on exactly what you meant when you said....."nice try"?