Kris - You are too BAD!!! I call myself an Obama-mama... :-)
Personally, my PREFERENCE is Single Payer because I trust government more than I trust corporate America BUT it is just a preference not a necessity and I do not believe it is politically possible. I'd also like to see us keep the public option in the choices but it is not a deal killer for me either..... My belief was best expressed by Mick and Keith - you can't always get what you want but ....you just might find - you get what you need....
I do not believe it is ever true that there is ONLY 1 WAY to accomplish something and I am open to ideas from all points of view.
If the Democrats want to retain a majority in the house we need to remember that we have a majority ONLY due to some conservative blue dogs who were able to win in states that are traditionally Republican and we need to listen to center of our party not the left.
I would completely support ANYTHING we come up with that addresses the problems in the current system and that sounds likely to help. In fact I'll be upset if we turn this into a my way or the highway argument on the Democrat side as well.
I don't think I'd put up a single-payer sign - my support is more for Obama and for working through the issues and for however we find we can get enough to support to solve them. I have believed all along that we can come up with something that works and that can pass.
Sue
All that's good Sue, but without a public option to keep the rest of the industry honest it's not got teeth, and we'll end up no better than we are now. Take an honest look at the German system. Look at Canada, and England, and France. Look at our own Medicare and Veteran's Health Care systems...This is not radical, and it is not untried. We need a major reform to remain competitive in the world market.
Now is not the time to buckle in to the people still spending $1,500,000 a day to prevent honest-to-goodness health care reform from happening (and cutting in to their profits). They know we're close to getting something really important accomplished, and they're throwing everything got at it to stop it...Now is absolutely not the time to back down!!!
I had dinner with an English friend at Doherty's tonight. He can't believe we're having such a debate on this. “The NHS isn't perfect, but it's sure a lot better than what you've got here!”. And before anyone beats their chest and pronounces “Yeah, but we've got the best medical treatment in the world” Sorry! For anything short of an ER visit he flies his family home for medical treatments (and sees his relatives instead of paying premiums), and says the waiting periods for seeing specialists there are no worse than they are here. He also shared that the in Britain, the quickest way for any political party to be banished from the political scene is to be opposed to the National Health Service.
I saw on Rachel Maddow tonight that something like 15% self-identifying Republicans in don't think Medicare is a government-run program. That's the kind of un(and mis)-informed opposition we're up against. In order for compromise to work, both sides have to be willing to work together. I'm all for the majority offering an olive branch to the minority once (which has been done), but once refused, well, they are the minority.
Doing half this job isn't good enough. President Obama is a very smart guy, but he's not going to get anything done without us reaffirming – constantly – that we elected him, and all the Democrats in Congress (even the Blue Dogs) to get the whole job done.
I think meaningful (with a public option) health care reform will do OK in the House. The Senate is where the squeaker is. 51 votes is enough to pass the bill, and if the opponents want to filibuster and shut down the Senate, then so be it...1/3 of the seats will be up for election in 2010. We'll be happy to make this the centerpiece of every campaign! Really, what better way to highlight the Republicans as the party of “No” than to show them, night after night, reading the Washington DC Telephone book for months on end. (Democrats can't shrink from the “threat” of filibuster, either...Either filibuster-for-real or vote!).
Oh yeah, HR-676 is the bill I'd like to see used as the starting point...
Fyi - by rules I am talking about holding the insurance industries feet the fire regarding these problems:
http://www.cspan.org/Watch/Media/2009/08/14/HP/R/22161/Pres+Obama+Lays+Out+Consumer+Protections+in+Town+Hall.aspx